0.07/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.12/0.16 % Command : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC 0.17/0.38 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu 0.17/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.17/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.17/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.17/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.17/0.38 % CPULimit : 1200 0.17/0.38 % WCLimit : 120 0.17/0.38 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 16:14:19 EDT 2021 0.17/0.38 % CPUTime : 0.17/0.38 % Number of cores: 8 0.17/0.38 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.17/0.38 # Version: 2.6rc1-ho 0.17/0.40 # No SInE strategy applied 0.17/0.40 # Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds 1.69/1.89 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d 1.69/1.89 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp. 1.69/1.89 # 1.69/1.89 # Preprocessing time : 0.089 s 1.69/1.89 # Presaturation interreduction done 1.69/1.89 # SatCheck found unsatisfiable ground set 1.69/1.89 1.69/1.89 # Proof found! 1.69/1.89 # SZS status Theorem 1.69/1.89 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 1.69/1.89 thf(fact_264_old_Opath2__hd, axiom, ![X7:g, X8:node, X9:list_node, X10:node]:((X8)=(hd_node @ X9)<=graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ X7 @ X8 @ X9 @ X10), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_264_old_Opath2__hd)). 1.69/1.89 thf(fact_126__092_060open_062_092_060And_062thesis_O_A_I_092_060And_062i_Ari_O_A_092_060lbrakk_062g_A_092_060turnstile_062_AdefNode_Ag_Ar_Nri_092_060rightarrow_062i_059_Ai_A_092_060in_062_Aset_Ams_059_A_092_060forall_062n_092_060in_062set_A_Ibutlast_Ari_J_O_An_A_092_060notin_062_Aset_Ams_059_Aprefix_Ari_Ars_092_060rbrakk_062_A_092_060Longrightarrow_062_Athesis_J_A_092_060Longrightarrow_062_Athesis_092_060close_062, axiom, ~(![X145:node, X146:list_node]:(graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ g2 @ (sSA_CF551432799de_val @ alpha_n @ defs @ phis @ g2 @ r) @ X146 @ X145=>(member_node @ X145 @ (set_node2 @ ms)=>(~(prefix_node @ X146 @ rs2)<=![X12:node]:(~(member_node @ X12 @ (set_node2 @ ms))<=member_node @ X12 @ (set_node2 @ (butlast_node @ X146))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_126__092_060open_062_092_060And_062thesis_O_A_I_092_060And_062i_Ari_O_A_092_060lbrakk_062g_A_092_060turnstile_062_AdefNode_Ag_Ar_Nri_092_060rightarrow_062i_059_Ai_A_092_060in_062_Aset_Ams_059_A_092_060forall_062n_092_060in_062set_A_Ibutlast_Ari_J_O_An_A_092_060notin_062_Aset_Ams_059_Aprefix_Ari_Ars_092_060rbrakk_062_A_092_060Longrightarrow_062_Athesis_J_A_092_060Longrightarrow_062_Athesis_092_060close_062)). 1.69/1.89 thf(fact_4_ri__props_I1_J, axiom, graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ g2 @ (sSA_CF551432799de_val @ alpha_n @ defs @ phis @ g2 @ r) @ ri @ i, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_4_ri__props_I1_J)). 1.69/1.89 thf(fact_5_old_Opath2__app, axiom, ![X7:g, X8:node, X9:list_node, X10:node, X349:list_node, X393:node]:(graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ X7 @ X8 @ X9 @ X10=>(graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ X7 @ X10 @ X349 @ X393=>graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ X7 @ X8 @ (append_node @ X9 @ (tl_node @ X349)) @ X393)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_5_old_Opath2__app)). 1.69/1.89 thf(conj_0, conjecture, graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ g2 @ n @ (append_node @ ns @ (tl_node @ ri)) @ (sSA_CF551432799de_val @ alpha_n @ defs @ phis @ g2 @ phi_r), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_0)). 1.69/1.89 thf(fact_3_assms_I7_J, axiom, graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ g2 @ n @ ns @ (sSA_CF551432799de_val @ alpha_n @ defs @ phis @ g2 @ r), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_3_assms_I7_J)). 1.69/1.89 thf(fact_1_ri__is__valid, axiom, (i)=(sSA_CF551432799de_val @ alpha_n @ defs @ phis @ g2 @ phi_r), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_1_ri__is__valid)). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X7:g, X8:node, X9:list_node, X10:node]:(graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ X7 @ X8 @ X9 @ X10=>(X8)=(hd_node @ X9)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_264_old_Opath2__hd])). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_8, plain, ~(![X145:node, X146:list_node]:(graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ g2 @ (sSA_CF551432799de_val @ alpha_n @ defs @ phis @ g2 @ r) @ X146 @ X145=>(member_node @ X145 @ (set_node2 @ ms)=>(![X12:node]:(member_node @ X12 @ (set_node2 @ (butlast_node @ X146))=>~member_node @ X12 @ (set_node2 @ ms))=>~prefix_node @ X146 @ rs2)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_126__092_060open_062_092_060And_062thesis_O_A_I_092_060And_062i_Ari_O_A_092_060lbrakk_062g_A_092_060turnstile_062_AdefNode_Ag_Ar_Nri_092_060rightarrow_062i_059_Ai_A_092_060in_062_Aset_Ams_059_A_092_060forall_062n_092_060in_062set_A_Ibutlast_Ari_J_O_An_A_092_060notin_062_Aset_Ams_059_Aprefix_Ari_Ars_092_060rbrakk_062_A_092_060Longrightarrow_062_Athesis_J_A_092_060Longrightarrow_062_Athesis_092_060close_062])). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X2336:g, X2337:node, X2338:list_node, X2339:node]:(~graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ X2336 @ X2337 @ X2338 @ X2339|(X2337)=(hd_node @ X2338)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X2130:node]:(graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ g2 @ (sSA_CF551432799de_val @ alpha_n @ defs @ phis @ g2 @ r) @ esk97_0 @ esk96_0&(member_node @ esk96_0 @ (set_node2 @ ms)&((~member_node @ X2130 @ (set_node2 @ (butlast_node @ esk97_0))|~member_node @ X2130 @ (set_node2 @ ms))&prefix_node @ esk97_0 @ rs2))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])])). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X4:list_node, X7:g, X8:node, X10:node]:((X8)=(hd_node @ X4)|~graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ X7 @ X8 @ X4 @ X10), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_12, plain, graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ g2 @ (sSA_CF551432799de_val @ alpha_n @ defs @ phis @ g2 @ r) @ ri @ i, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_4_ri__props_I1_J])). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_13, plain, graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ g2 @ (sSA_CF551432799de_val @ alpha_n @ defs @ phis @ g2 @ r) @ esk97_0 @ esk96_0, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_14, plain, (sSA_CF551432799de_val @ alpha_n @ defs @ phis @ g2 @ r)=(hd_node @ ri), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_15, plain, graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ g2 @ (hd_node @ ri) @ esk97_0 @ esk96_0, inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14])). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_16, plain, ![X2651:g, X2652:node, X2653:list_node, X2654:node, X2655:list_node, X2656:node]:(~graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ X2651 @ X2652 @ X2653 @ X2654|(~graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ X2651 @ X2654 @ X2655 @ X2656|graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ X2651 @ X2652 @ (append_node @ X2653 @ (tl_node @ X2655)) @ X2656)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_5_old_Opath2__app])])). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_17, plain, graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ g2 @ (hd_node @ ri) @ ri @ i, inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_14])). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_18, plain, (hd_node @ ri)=(hd_node @ esk97_0), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_15])). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ~graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ g2 @ n @ (append_node @ ns @ (tl_node @ ri)) @ (sSA_CF551432799de_val @ alpha_n @ defs @ phis @ g2 @ phi_r), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_20, plain, graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ g2 @ n @ ns @ (sSA_CF551432799de_val @ alpha_n @ defs @ phis @ g2 @ r), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_3_assms_I7_J])). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_21, plain, ![X4:list_node, X5:list_node, X8:node, X10:node, X7:g, X12:node]:(graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ X7 @ X8 @ (append_node @ X4 @ (tl_node @ X5)) @ X12|~graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ X7 @ X8 @ X4 @ X10|~graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ X7 @ X10 @ X5 @ X12), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_22, plain, graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ g2 @ (hd_node @ esk97_0) @ ri @ i, inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18])). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ~graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ g2 @ n @ (append_node @ ns @ (tl_node @ ri)) @ (sSA_CF551432799de_val @ alpha_n @ defs @ phis @ g2 @ phi_r), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_24, plain, (i)=(sSA_CF551432799de_val @ alpha_n @ defs @ phis @ g2 @ phi_r), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_1_ri__is__valid])). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_25, plain, graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ g2 @ n @ ns @ (hd_node @ ri), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_14])). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_26, plain, ![X8:node, X4:list_node]:(graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ g2 @ X8 @ (append_node @ X4 @ (tl_node @ ri)) @ i|~graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ g2 @ X8 @ X4 @ (hd_node @ esk97_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22])). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ~graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ g2 @ n @ (append_node @ ns @ (tl_node @ ri)) @ i, inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24])). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_28, plain, graph_1012773594_edgeD @ alpha_n @ invar @ inEdges @ g2 @ n @ ns @ (hd_node @ esk97_0), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_18])). 1.69/1.89 thf(c_0_29, plain, ($false), inference(cdclpropres,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_27, c_0_28]), ['proof']). 1.69/1.89 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 1.69/1.89 # Proof object total steps : 30 1.69/1.89 # Proof object clause steps : 17 1.69/1.89 # Proof object formula steps : 13 1.69/1.89 # Proof object conjectures : 4 1.69/1.89 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2 1.69/1.89 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2 1.69/1.89 # Proof object initial clauses used : 7 1.69/1.89 # Proof object initial formulas used : 7 1.69/1.89 # Proof object generating inferences : 3 1.69/1.89 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6 1.69/1.89 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative 1.69/1.89 # Parsed axioms : 419 1.69/1.89 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 1.69/1.89 # Initial clauses : 904 1.69/1.89 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 99 1.69/1.89 # Initial clauses in saturation : 805 1.69/1.89 # Processed clauses : 16737 1.69/1.89 # ...of these trivial : 167 1.69/1.89 # ...subsumed : 11570 1.69/1.89 # ...remaining for further processing : 5000 1.69/1.89 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1798 1.69/1.89 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 1.69/1.89 # Backward-subsumed : 195 1.69/1.89 # Backward-rewritten : 82 1.69/1.89 # Generated clauses : 75095 1.69/1.89 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 69885 1.69/1.89 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 19 1.69/1.89 # Paramodulations : 73049 1.69/1.89 # Factorizations : 6 1.69/1.89 # NegExts : 4 1.69/1.89 # Equation resolutions : 1846 1.69/1.89 # Propositional unsat checks : 1 1.69/1.89 # Propositional check models : 0 1.69/1.89 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 1 1.69/1.89 # Propositional clauses : 57217 1.69/1.89 # Propositional clauses after purity: 1448 1.69/1.89 # Propositional unsat core size : 3 1.69/1.89 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 1.69/1.89 # Propositional encoding time : 0.066 1.69/1.89 # Propositional solver time : 0.004 1.69/1.89 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 1.69/1.89 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.066 1.69/1.89 # Success case prop solver time : 0.004 1.69/1.89 # Current number of processed clauses : 3961 1.69/1.89 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 379 1.69/1.89 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 1.69/1.89 # Negative unit clauses : 1084 1.69/1.89 # Non-unit-clauses : 2498 1.69/1.89 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 53256 1.69/1.89 # ...number of literals in the above : 142898 1.69/1.89 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 1.69/1.89 # Current number of archived clauses : 907 1.69/1.89 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1124883 1.69/1.89 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 804468 1.69/1.89 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5050 1.69/1.89 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 117516 1.69/1.89 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 1.69/1.89 # BW rewrite match attempts : 552 1.69/1.89 # BW rewrite match successes : 48 1.69/1.89 # Condensation attempts : 0 1.69/1.89 # Condensation successes : 0 1.69/1.89 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1725696 1.69/1.89 1.69/1.89 # ------------------------------------------------- 1.69/1.89 # User time : 1.438 s 1.69/1.89 # System time : 0.051 s 1.69/1.89 # Total time : 1.489 s 1.69/1.89 # Maximum resident set size: 2660 pages 1.69/1.89 EOF